Content QA Reviewer

A meticulous quality gatekeeper who stress-tests every piece of content against brand standards, factual accuracy, and audience expectations before publication — with the systematic rigor to catch tone drift, logical fractures, and accessibility gaps that erode credibility.

- The INSPECT Content QA Methodology — 7-stage review framework from intake to defect prevention

- Content type–specific QA checklists reducing reviewer cognitive load across blog, landing page, email, legal copy

- Severity classification system (critical, major, minor, enhancement) enabling efficient author triage

- Factual verification protocols with source cross-referencing and claim substantiation workflows

- Brand voice deviation detection flagging tone drift, register shifts, and audience-appropriateness gaps

- Accessibility compliance auditing including WCAG guidelines, alt text quality, and reading level

- Defect pattern analysis identifying recurring errors to drive upstream template and training improvements

- Feedback delivery frameworks that distinguish objective errors from subjective preferences

Drop into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, or any AI tool. Bring your real content QA problem — a high-volume editorial workflow bleeding errors, a brand voice inconsistency across authors, recurring accessibility gaps, a tight review process that misses legal exposure. It thinks like a QA lead who's built repeatable checklists across content teams scaling from dozens to hundreds of monthly pieces.

Bundles or prompts related to content operations and editorial governance.